CI
CHEGG, INC (CHGG)·Q4 2024 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q4 revenue and adjusted EBITDA exceeded guidance, but were down sharply year over year as Google’s AI Overviews (AIO) pressured traffic and subscriber acquisition; Chegg launched a strategic review and filed a complaint against Google, both potential stock catalysts .
- Q4 2024 revenue was $143.5M (-24% YoY) and adjusted EBITDA was $36.6M (25% margin), both above prior guidance ($141–$143M revenue; $32–$34M adj. EBITDA). GAAP diluted EPS was -$0.06; non-GAAP diluted EPS was $0.17 .
- Subscribers fell to 3.6M (-21% YoY), Subscription Services revenue fell 23% YoY, and ARPU declined ~3% YoY; management cited a temporary retention dip in Nov–Dec and continued traffic declines from AIO .
- Q1’25 guidance implies further near-term pressure: revenue $114–$116M, Subscriptions $104–$106M, gross margin 66–67%, adjusted EBITDA $13–$14M .
- Balance sheet remains strong: $528M cash and investments, net cash ~$42M after repurchasing ~$116.6M of 2026 converts at a ~$20M discount; FY24 free cash flow was $50.3M despite ~$25M restructuring and settlement cash outlays in Q4 .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Beat Q4 guidance on revenue ($143.5M vs $141–$143M) and adjusted EBITDA ($36.6M vs $32–$34M); CFO framed the operating model as highly efficient (≈$0.9M EBITDA per incremental $1M revenue) .
- Strengthened balance sheet by repurchasing ~$116.6M of 2026 converts at a ~$20M discount; ended Q4 with $528M cash/investments and ~$42M net cash .
- Product and AI execution: 66% more questions asked in 2024 vs 2023, step-by-step individualized Q&A enhancements, “Solution Scout” LLM comparison launched; Busuu up 9% in 2024 and +46% in enterprise, with better conversion under freemium .
-
What Went Wrong
- Top-line and subscriber pressure: Q4 revenue -24% YoY; Subscription Services -23% YoY; subscribers -21% YoY; ARPU -3% YoY .
- Traffic headwinds intensified: non-subscriber traffic was -19% YoY in Q3 and -37% in October; management cited -49% in January 2025 as AIO expanded .
- Profitability mix and execution: GAAP gross margin declined to 68% (vs 76% in Q4’23); temporary retention dip in Nov–Dec weighed on ARPU and revenue by an estimated “couple” of million dollars .
Financial Results
Q4 vs Guidance (announced Nov 12, 2024)
Segment Breakdown
KPIs
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet (selected)
Guidance Changes
Note: Company previously guided Q4 2024 (revenue $141–$143M; Subscriptions $126–$128M; GM 67–68%; adj. EBITDA $32–$34M) and exceeded those figures .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We are launching a strategic review process and filed a complaint against Google… Google’s AIO… materially impacting our acquisitions, revenue, and employees.” — Nathan Schultz, CEO .
- “We delivered a solid fourth quarter, surpassing our Q4 guidance for both revenue and adjusted EBITDA.” — David Longo, CFO .
- “Our implementation of machine learning, and multiple AI models, has significantly reduced the cost of creating content by more than 70%… in Q3 we implemented a Satisfaction Guarantee.” — Nathan Schultz .
- “Busuu… first 30-day conversion… +31% and led to 9% year-over-year revenue growth for 2024; enterprise revenue up 46%.” — Nathan Schultz .
- “We concluded the quarter with cash and investments of $528 million and a net cash balance of $42 million.” — David Longo .
Q&A Highlights
- Operating leverage: “If we added an incremental $1M of sales… dropping $900k… to the bottom line.” — CFO .
- Enterprise/B2I model: Seat-based pricing; ~5 pilots active; targeting ~35 more in 2025; aim to convert pilots to campus-wide deployments — CEO .
- Retention/ARPU: Temporary retention dip in Nov–Dec; ARPU -3% YoY; estimated ~$2–$3M revenue impact; trends normalized by late Dec/Jan — CFO .
- “Solution Scout” intent: Save student time by comparing LLM outputs vs Chegg’s solution; build trust and next-best-actions engagement — CEO .
- Q1’25 guidance assumptions: Continuation of lower traffic/acquisitions; retention stabilizing; pushing product and marketing to “call a bottom” later in 2025 — CFO .
Estimates Context
- S&P Global consensus (EPS/Revenue/EBITDA) for Q4 2024 and Q1 2025 was unavailable due to access limits at time of analysis. As a result, we benchmarked actuals vs company-issued guidance.
- Implication: Chegg exceeded Q4 guidance across revenue and adjusted EBITDA, but Q1’25 guide reflects continued top-line pressure (revenue $114–$116M; GM 66–67%; adj. EBITDA $13–$14M), likely prompting near-term estimate resets toward lower 1H’25 revenues/margins before potential stabilization from product/marketing initiatives .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Near-term fundamentals remain pressured by Google AIO-driven traffic declines and softer acquisitions; Q1’25 guide confirms continued headwinds .
- Execution positive on controllables: Q4 revenue and adjusted EBITDA beat, tight expense control, and leverage (≈90% flow-through) position Chegg to benefit from any traffic or conversion improvements .
- Product differentiation advancing: AI-personalized Q&A, “Solution Scout,” and tailored practice aim to increase engagement, retention, and perceived value vs generic LLMs .
- Diversification optionality: Enterprise/B2I pilots (seat-based pricing) and Busuu enterprise growth (+46% in 2024) can add recurring revenue streams less reliant on SEO .
- Balance sheet strength and deleveraging (note repurchases at discount, net cash) provide runway to invest and navigate volatility .
- Strategic review and Google litigation are material catalysts; outcomes (M&A, go-private, settlement/behavioral remedies) could reshape the risk/reward .
- Watch KPIs: traffic trend inflection, subscriber adds, ARPU trajectory, and retention stability; monitor Q2/Q3 2025 for evidence that marketing/product investments offset AIO headwinds .
Appendix: Additional Details
- Q4 non-GAAP adjustments included share-based comp, restructuring charges, and other items; GAAP net loss of $(6.1)M vs non-GAAP net income of $19.0M ($0.17/share) reflect these exclusions .
- FY24 free cash flow was $50.3M despite significant restructuring and legal payments; Q4 capex down 52% YoY with content costs -56% YoY, aided by AI-driven content efficiency .